Free Download How Judges Think
Be focus on exactly what you actually intend to get. Schedule that currently becomes your emphasis should be found quicker. Nonetheless, what type of publication that you actually wish to check out. Have you found it? If confuse always interrupts you, we will provide you a brand-new suggested publication to check out. How Judges Think is most likely you will require a lot. Love this book, enjoy the lesson, as well as enjoy the impact.
How Judges Think
Free Download How Judges Think
Exactly what do you do to begin reading How Judges Think Searching guide that you enjoy to check out first or discover an intriguing book How Judges Think that will make you would like to review? Everybody has distinction with their reason of checking out an e-book How Judges Think Actuary, reading practice should be from earlier. Several individuals could be love to read, however not an e-book. It's not fault. An individual will certainly be tired to open the thick book with tiny words to read. In more, this is the genuine problem. So do take place possibly with this How Judges Think
That's a typical condition. To conquer this includes, what should do? Checking out a publication? Surely? Why not? Book is among the sources that lots of people depend on of it. Also it will certainly depend upon guide type and also title, or the writer; publications constantly have positive ideas and also minds. How Judges Think is among the choices for you to make you looking forward for your life. As known, reviewing will lead you for a better method. The manner in which you take obviously will certainly be analogously with your case.
To earn sure regarding the book that ought to read, we will certainly show you just how this book is very more suitable. You can see exactly how the title exists. It's so interesting. You can likewise see just how the cover design is program; this is exactly what makes you feel interested to look much more. You could additionally discover the content of How Judges Think in an excellent expiation, this is what makes you, plus to feel so completely satisfied analysis this book.
You could quickly finish them to see the page and then appreciate getting guide. Having the soft data of this publication is additionally good enough. By this way, you may not should bring the book anywhere. You can save in some compatible gadgets. When you have determined to start reading How Judges Think once more, you could begin it all over and also whenever when well done.
From Publishers Weekly
Posner is unique in the world of American jurisprudence, a highly regarded U.S. appellate judge and a prolific and controversial writer on legal philosophy (The Little Book of Plagiarism). Opinionated, sarcastic and argumentative as ever, Posner is happy to weigh in not only on how judges think, but how he thinks they should think. When sticking to explaining the nine intellectual approaches to judging that he identifies, and to the gap between legal academics and judges, and his well-formulated pragmatic approach to judging, Posner is insightful, accessible, often funny and a model of clarity. When he charges off into longstanding arguments with fellow legal theorists (liberal commentator Ronald Dworkin, for one) or examines doctrinal discrepancies in the opinions of Supreme Court justices, he writes for a far more limited audience. For the record, although Justice Scalia is a favorite target, none of the Supreme Court nine escapes Posner's lethally sharp pen. Posner's two major points—that to a great extent judges make decisions based not on theory but on who they are, their gender, education, class and experiences, and that the Supreme Court is a political court regardless of what theory of constitutional interpretation justices claim—are well worthwhile and deeply rooted in common sense and experience. (Apr.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Read more
Review
Posner is unique in the world of American jurisprudence, a highly regarded U.S. appellate judge and a prolific and controversial writer on legal philosophy. Opinionated, sarcastic and argumentative as ever, Posner is happy to weigh in not only on how judges think, but how he thinks they should think. When sticking to explaining the nine intellectual approaches to judging that he identifies, and to the gap between legal academics and judges, and his well-formulated pragmatic approach to judging, Posner is insightful, accessible, often funny and a model of clarity. (Publishers Weekly 2008-02-11)Posner's latest book, How Judges Think, is important, if only because it's Posner looking at his own profession from the inside. Two of the chapters, "Judges Are Not Law Professors" and "Is Pragmatic Adjudication Inescapable?," are worth the price of admission by themselves. The book can be read as one long screed against the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and stands as a refutation to those who believe the category of conservative can lazily be applied to a mind as independent as Posner's. --Barry Gewen (New York Times online 2008-07-09)A prolific and brilliant writer, Posner's How Judges Think is perhaps his most illuminating work for its profound, and sometimes polemical, insights into the judicial process...Judge Posner's examination of the issues is thorough, scholarly and riveting. He has written an important book--a must read not just for lawyers, but also for anyone who wants to understand how the inscrutable, and sometimes oracular, process of judging really works. --James D. Zirin (Forbes.com 2010-06-08)
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Hardcover: 400 pages
Publisher: Harvard University Press (April 30, 2008)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0674028201
ISBN-13: 978-0674028203
Product Dimensions:
6 x 0.9 x 9.2 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds
Average Customer Review:
4.0 out of 5 stars
30 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#1,041,551 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Posner is pretty much the Go-To Guy in legal studies today. You may disagree with his conclusions but he won’t bore you (he’s a forceful writer), you won’t find it hard to follow him (he writes clearly), and you won’t wonder whether he has a hidden agenda (he is open and forthright in stating his sources, as well as any reservations he has about his own conclusions drawn from them). He’s academic (well documented and well reasoned) but not overly academic: his observations are always rooted in experience, for he is both an eminent teacher of jurisprudence at the University of Chicago and an acting federal circuit court judge, with years of practice on the bench. His books are not easy reads –he explores complicated issues and doesn’t simplify them—but you’ll never get lost in them, because he is an exceptionally articulate explainer. Years ago, when I was a history professor at a small women’s college in the east, I taught a course on historical method, and it was writers (thinkers) (scholars) like Posner I wanted to introduce to my students, not that he writes like historians do but that he writes forcefully, sparingly, lucidly and compellingly, and persuasion is just as important a part of any scholar’s business as explication.This is the third book by Posner that I have read. All three books were good. Two –including this one—are superb, models of engaged scholarship. (If you haven’t read anything by him before, I recommend you start with Reflections on Judging, 2013.) Posner is It.Arguing against legalism and various forms of moralism, Posner argues for a restrained pragmatic approach to the law, in line with his models on the bench, especially Holmes (“The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experienceâ€), who accepted that the written law only went so far and that beyond that point, the prudent judge crossed from enforcing pre-existing, stringent rules to making new law. Law in action is imprecise but not amorphous. “In our system the law as it is enforced in courts is created by judges, using legal propositions as raw materials.†He does not argue that a judge can make any law he wants. Rather, he argues that in any but the most constrained case, the judge must choose among courses of action that are not automatically (because the law tells the judge exactly what to do) clean --or should I say clear? From this simple premise –that judges are de facto legislators—Posner moves to a critique of many, maybe most academic commentators on the law, and a scathing critique of what is taught in even the best law schools in our country. He has, is in other books, harsh words to say about Justice Scalia’s supposed originalism, which he finds inadequate and self-deceiving –even Scalia admitted that he moved beyond it at times.If I were a lawyer, I would read this book NOW.
In this erudite and highly readable book, a distinguished judge and scholar provides the reader with remarkable insights into how judges think, or ought to think, when interpreting and creating the law. Judge Posner rejects sterile legalist theories in favor of a pragmatic approach to judicial decision-making, heavily influenced by economic theory. Drawing on insights from psychology, American legal history, and economics, Judge Posner argues persuasively that judges are not rule-bound adjudicating machines mechanically applying the law; rather judges creatively engage the real world by balancing competing interests, weighing consequences, and applying cost/benefit analyses when interpreting the law. In the process, judges, at least in the unique American judicial system, inevitably act as legislators and, yes, as human beings, they are influenced by life experiences, political beliefs, and psychological make-up. The result is a highly sophisticated and nuanced discussion of how judges think, or at least how they should think. This book is written in a lively style, with humor, wit, and a great deal of wisdom, including some very practical advice regarding how attorneys should frame their arguments when they appear in court. (Hint: instead of focusing on words; focus on the real world consequences of your arguments).
If you have been inside the world Judge Posner writes about, you will know how extraordinarily practical this book is. This is how judges think - not how they think they think. Legal decisions arise in real contexts and judges almost always react in part to that context. If they did not, then our law would be the same as it was in 1242. Posner illuminates the pragmatic truth clearly while providing ample theoretical background for the budding philosopher.At a time when the merely thoughtless insist that the "law be applied as written" (how, exactly, does one apply the phrase "equal protection" as written and divorced from context?)this refreshing burst of candor and common sense presented by the greatest legal mind of the past 50 years is critically important reading.
How Judges Think PDF
How Judges Think EPub
How Judges Think Doc
How Judges Think iBooks
How Judges Think rtf
How Judges Think Mobipocket
How Judges Think Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar